Meet the construction cycle
Temporary lodging on a separate edge serves rotating crews, then gives way to six connected townhome buildings in Phase 4.

GREATER BURLINGTON
A proposed $15 billion steel plant.
A housing need that already exists.
Our vision for a community built around both.
OUR THESIS
We believe Greater Burlington offers the strongest combination of everyday services, regional access and existing housing need for this opportunity. We want to establish a position early, then build as the evidence supports it.
Temporary lodging on a separate edge serves rotating crews, then gives way to six connected townhome buildings in Phase 4.
250 apartments, 120 compact detached rental homes and a later 36-home attached phase offer different ways to live. Each release follows verified demand.
Iowa multifamily development, construction expertise and a broader portfolio support the work ahead.
THE CATALYST
On September 28, 2026, federal officials announced Mesabi Metallics’ proposed steel complex in Lee County. The White House describes it as the largest steel plant ever built in the United States.
Company projections. Construction jobs do not establish the number of workers on site at one time, the number coming from elsewhere, or the number needing local lodging.
The planned complex would connect Minnesota iron ore with electric-arc-furnace steelmaking in Iowa. The announced first phase targets 7.5 million tons of annual capacity.
Target for steel production.
Housing delivery must follow verified milestones.
WHAT IS STILL OPEN
The exact plant site, permitting, financing, utility readiness and construction schedule still need confirmation. September 29 reporting identified unresolved land, permit and incentive steps.
Wever is a working location assumption. It is not a confirmed steel-plant address.
Furnished, flexible lodging for mobile crews. Contract coverage and demobilization matter.
Homes for permanent employees and families, supported by the broader Burlington rental market.
THE LOCATION THESIS
Our bet is on Greater Burlington: the area’s largest city near the expected Wever location, with a hospital campus, a community college, established shopping and regional transportation.
Approximate place markers. Wever is shown as a reference area, not a confirmed steel-plant boundary. No housing parcel or route is implied.
The reference trip starts at the existing Wever fertilizer plant. A final steel gate, shift traffic and the selected housing parcel could change the commute.
| Community | Reference drive | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Burlington | ~25 min | Larger city and services |
| West Burlington | ~26 min | Hospital, college, retail |
| Fort Madison | ~20 min | Closer alternative |
| Keokuk | ~44 min | Southern regional option |
Research estimates to city centers, not guaranteed commutes. Fort Madison has a credible proximity advantage. If the plant locates farther south, we reassess Burlington’s position.
Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center’s West Burlington campus anchors local care. Great River Health employs more than 2,800 people across its system, adding another potential renter base.
Southeastern Community College, schools and the West Burlington shopping corridor support household life beyond the workday. Partnerships and school capacity would require local discussions.
US-61 connects the corridor. US-34 crosses the Mississippi. Burlington also has an Amtrak station and a regional airport.
DEMAND BEFORE THE ANNOUNCEMENT
The January 2023 housing study identified 412 total new homes for Burlington, including 248 rentals. This predates the steel announcement.
Lee County has an estimated 32,306 residents, down 3.7% from its 2020 population base. A project of this size could change the region’s trajectory, but long-term population decline makes independent demand testing essential.
The Lee County study places the median home’s construction year around 1952. The opportunity includes replacement and better housing choices, not only population growth.
That distinction matters: a new home must earn its rent through quality, location and everyday usefulness.
Vacancy measures differ. The permit total is 23 in Des Moines County plus 13 in Lee County. Permits are not delivered homes.
RENT CAPACITY
At the reported average of about $49 per hour, a 40-hour week over 52 weeks implies roughly $101,920 in annual gross pay.
Monthly housing budget at 30% of that gross income. This includes housing costs and is an affordability illustration, not a proposed rent.
Burlington’s reported median gross rent is $924 for existing stock. That is context, not a comparable rent for new construction.
Permanent homes should also appeal to healthcare employees, existing households and other regional workers. Plant employees alone do not establish a 406-home leasing plan.
Before setting rents, we need current comparable properties, vacancy checks, concessions, the competing pipeline and employer interviews.
ILLUSTRATIVE DEMAND SENSITIVITY
Change the assumptions to see why phasing matters. This is a scenario, not a forecast.
196 additional households needed to fill the 406-home concept, including Phase 4.
Jobs × new-household share × renter share × Nelson capture. One employee per new household assumed. No indirect jobs added. Local household demand and prior study targets must not be double counted.A LOCAL PRECEDENT
The fertilizer plant had more than 2,700 construction workers on site in early 2015. Regional planners evaluated lodging across a 45-minute radius.
For Nelson, the lesson is to secure temporary demand through employers and contractors, while testing permanent housing against durable household demand.
A WORKING SITE CONCEPT
An illustrative 25-acre layout near Burlington.
Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, or open a marker and rendering.

The interactive model is unavailable. The rendering and program below show the concept.
FROM CONSTRUCTION CYCLE TO PERMANENT COMMUNITY
Temporary lodging uses a separate 3.1-acre western edge. Once the modules are removed, Phase 4 adds six buildings of six connected townhomes along a central street. Its permanent connection joins the existing resident entrance.
The working test fits 36 additional homes and two side-by-side parking spaces per home, while reserving about 0.7 acres for drainage, utilities and guest parking. Phases 2 and 3 may proceed together; Phase 4 follows demobilization, site restoration and its own demand check.
| Program / layout | Test |
|---|---|
| Temporary village / Phase 4 edge | 3.1 acres |
| Apartments in two four-story buildings | 250 homes |
| Detached cottage homes in six courts | 120 homes |
| Later attached homes in six connected buildings | 36 homes |
| Internal access streets for the six courts | 2 streets |
| Shared event clubhouse | 10,000 sf |
| Total illustrative site | 25.0 acres |
The main road is shown along the right side, with direct resident access to the apartments and detached homes. Two internal streets branch left and right into the courts; there is no street along the leftmost court edge. Temporary lodging has a separate southern service approach. External roads are illustrative and outside the 25-acre boundary; no parcel or access rights are established. Phase 4 adds a separate central street within the western strip after removal. Parking, setbacks, stormwater and fire access remain unverified.
OUR DEVELOPMENT VISION
Phase 1 solid · Future Phases 2 + 3 shown translucentlyPHASE 1
Furnished double-wide or modular housing on the site’s edge. Designed for workers who spend several days here and then return home.
Clean private sleeping rooms with opaque blackout shades, durable furnishings and secure storage. Reliable Wi-Fi, laundry, a shared lounge and practical kitchen access. Pickup-friendly parking and a shuttle pickup point.
Explore contractor block bookings and a specialist lodging operator. Size the first release to verified beds, shift patterns and contract duration.
A separate entrance, removable utility connections and a funded removal and restoration obligation. Coordinate removal with contractor demobilization, then prepare this edge for Phase 4 attached townhomes when demand supports them.
North Dakota’s Bakken workforce lodges demonstrate modular accommodation with shared services. We would adapt that model to a city-adjacent Iowa setting.
Temporary-use approval and the removal plan belong at the beginning. Historical oilfield room rates do not establish rates here.
The 3D explorer shows 30 modular footprints on a 3.1-acre edge zone. Each module has a 5.5 × 5.5 m pad for two cars parked side by side, or 60 spaces across the village. A four-private-bed layout would imply 120 beds; unit plans, support services and final parking demand still need operator review. Neither count nor occupancy is committed.
Final capacity depends on the unit plan, code, utility service, operator model and contractor commitments. No revenue or occupancy forecast is assumed.

RESEARCH INTO THE ROOM
NIOSH recommends a very dark, quiet and cool sleep environment. Ordinary blinds can leak light; opaque shades or lined draperies should also block light at the edges.
Nelson’s proposed design response to shift-work guidance. The plant’s actual shift patterns and contractor requirements remain to be confirmed.
Plan removal, utility treatment and soil restoration from day one. The same edge can support 36 attached rental homes after temporary lodging is removed. Release Phase 4 only after restoration, infrastructure and market demand are confirmed.
Phase 2 · Apartments before the later attached-home phasePHASE 2
Two 125-unit buildings. Three to four stories, wood-frame construction and surface parking. The model tests four stories to conserve land.
Opaque blackout shades with light-blocking edges, acoustic separation and quiet bedroom placement. Locate noisy service functions away from bedrooms and review mechanical noise. These are proposed design priorities informed by NIOSH sleep guidance.
In-unit laundry, reliable internet, secure package handling and controlled entries. Convenient surface parking and shielded path lighting support late arrivals without directing light into sleeping rooms.
Simple building forms, durable siding with brick accents and practical landscaping. No underground parking or luxury-dependent rent thesis.
Parking range assumes 1.6–1.8 stalls per apartment and requires local zoning review. Fire protection, accessibility, elevators, height and construction type require architect and code review. No code eligibility is assumed.
Phase 3 · Compact detached homes in the completed communityPHASE 3
Six neighborhood courts of approximately 20 homes each. All 120 homes are detached, with visible gaps between buildings. Twenty low-profile cottage homes surround each open shared green, with individual entries and walking connections to the clubhouse. Single-story façades, simple pitched roofs and small covered entries take their cue from the supplied cottage reference.
A curved loop slows the experience of arrival and creates a recognizable address. Separate cottage homes turn with the street. Each garage and front entry faces inward toward its own court loop; side and rear walls have residential windows. Two internal access streets branch left and right into the six courts.
Each court frames a usable common lawn with shade trees, benches and a walking path. Front porches overlook the neighborhood; simple entries and short parking drives stay part of a landscaped street.
A planted promenade links the six courts to the clubhouse and apartments. Common lawns, a practical gym and reservable gathering space serve the whole community.
The revised 25-acre sketch tests 120 low-profile cottages, each within an 8 × 12 m footprint (about 26 × 39 feet). This is approximately 1,030 sf at ground level including the garage, not net living area. Usable living space, any loft and final floor plans remain to be designed. The wider ground footprint creates tighter spacing; setbacks and fire separation may change the count. Six open court centers establish the neighborhood structure. This is a conceptual plan that requires site-specific design. Turning radii, pedestrian crossings, parking and final yield require design.
Parallel delivery is the preferred concept when absorption, infrastructure and financing support it. Homes can release in smaller groups if demand arrives more slowly.
Phase 4 · Attached homes after temporary housing removalPHASE 4
Replace temporary lodging with 36 attached rental homes: six buildings, each with six connected homes. Modest two-story forms, individual entries and repeated gables take their cue from the supplied townhome reference.
Three buildings line each side of a central street. A new connection joins the existing resident entrance after temporary housing is removed.
Each home tests a 6 × 9 m footprint over two stories, approximately 1,160 sf gross. Two side-by-side parking spaces sit in front of each home. Shared lawns soften building ends.
About 0.7 acres at the south end stay reserved for drainage, utilities and guest parking. This is infrastructure capacity to design, not a new park or an engineered stormwater solution.
Temporary lodging leaves first. Confirm restoration, utility capacity, street access, civil feasibility and demand before advancing Phase 4. The six court greens and shared clubhouse remain amenities for the whole community.
36 homes is a schematic capacity, not an approved yield. The 3.1-acre strip includes all Phase 4 buildings, parking, circulation, setbacks and infrastructure reserve. Final survey, stormwater, fire access, accessibility, zoning and a priced design may change the count.
Completed community · Shared clubhouse with connected parkingTHE SHARED HEART
A place to train before a shift, share dinner with neighbors and celebrate with family. One clubhouse gives the entire community a reason to gather.
Amenities, finishes and operating hours are concepts, not commitments. A 10,000-sf clubhouse equals about 83 sf per detached home if Phase 3 alone bears the cost. Sharing it with the apartments is central to this vision.

THE EXPERIENCE BEHIND THE VISION
Development, construction and ownership experience
at the scale this opportunity deserves.
Company-reported figures. Multifamily total reflects Nelson’s published summary. Completed project volume is firmwide, not invested equity, assets under management or investment returns.
MULTIFAMILY FIRST
Ground-up apartments and historic conversions demonstrate our range. For Burlington, the most relevant experience is delivering new housing, coordinating construction and preparing properties for long-term operation.
Eight Des Moines properties. Select a location for its project page and published status.
Senior living and behavioral health extend the geographic reach. Hospitality, office, retail and industrial work add breadth to the company’s delivery experience.
Selected public development-map locations. Categories can overlap. Statuses follow the source where supplied. Sold and future projects remain labeled. This is not a map of current ownership or a complete construction inventory.
A closer view of Nelson’s published Iowa development locations, with Burlington shown separately as the area of opportunity.
Selected Nelson project examples. Their scale, returns and product economics do not establish the outcome of the Burlington concept.
THE ORGANIZATION BEHIND IT
Our integrated approach brings site planning, preconstruction and financing into the same conversation early. Burlington still requires its own local partnerships, entitlement work and market proof.

Firm leadership and development experience since founding Nelson in 1999.

Leadership spanning asset management, financial modeling and real estate capital structures.

Leads multifamily, mixed-use and hospitality development from opportunity through delivery.
Current company leadership. A project-specific Burlington team has not yet been designated.
DISCIPLINED EARLY POSITIONING
Our vision is to secure the right position near Burlington and match housing delivery to demand as it becomes real. A delayed plant or a slower hiring ramp must change the plan.
Use the 25-acre concept to screen sites, favoring usable land, direct permanent resident access and independent temporary access. Confirm zoning, temporary use, utilities, flood exposure, stormwater, environmental conditions and access to the eventual plant gate.
Require a credible construction mobilization schedule, contractor demand, operating partner, approvals and removal budget before committing to the village. Test a smaller first release.
Refresh rents and vacancy, evaluate competing supply and verify relocation demand. Price the apartment and townhome designs separately. Advance both together only if financing and absorption support the combined program.
Coordinate utility phases and resident access. Remove temporary housing after contractor demobilization under a funded plan. Phase 4 follows removal, site restoration, civil design and a separate demand check. Stage releases if leasing or plant hiring slows.
| Uncertainty | Why it matters | Our response |
|---|---|---|
| Plant timing and financing | Announcements may precede construction by years. | Milestone-based commitments and limited early exposure. |
| Final plant location | A southern site could weaken the Burlington commute case. | Re-run routing from the selected parcel to the confirmed gate. |
| Workforce and household formation | Local hires, commuters and shared households reduce new rentals. | Employer interviews, contractor agreements and market research. |
| Competition and achievable rent | New supply and existing rents may limit revenue. | Independent rent and absorption study before underwriting. |
| Site yield and delivery cost | Drainage, utilities, code and parking can reduce unit count. | Civil test fit, agency review and priced design alternatives. |
| Temporary counterparty exposure | A cancelled contract or abrupt demobilization can strand lodging. | Credit review, payment security and a funded removal plan. |
A successful industrial investment could also support downtown rehabilitation, for-sale homes and services such as childcare. Those are future avenues to investigate, outside this housing concept.
No acquisition is represented as complete. No budget, rent schedule, return target, capital structure or investment terms have been established for this concept.
This presentation shares Nelson’s research and vision. It makes no investment ask or offering.
NELSON CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT
Our conviction begins with Burlington’s existing needs.
Our opportunity grows as the steel project advances.
RESEARCH RECORD
Research snapshot: October 1, 2026. Use the links below to review the evidence behind the story. Project announcements, published portfolio status and market conditions can change.
Official and company projections carry attribution. Housing-study targets retain their original geography and date. Design choices and scenario inputs are Nelson planning assumptions.
The 3D model is a diagrammatic test of the program. AI renderings and animated films illustrate character and experience. They are not photographs of a selected site, exact reconstructions of the model, proof of unit counts or approved construction plans. The vision assumes an ordinary inland site; no waterfront location or river view is represented.
Maps use public project locations and approximate regional place markers. No parcel boundary, confirmed steel-plant location, current ownership status or engineered travel time is implied.
LET’S TALK ABOUT WHAT COMES NEXT

YOUR CONTACT
COO & Director of Development
Nelson Construction & Development
Connect with Alexander to discuss the Burlington housing vision, potential sites and project partnerships.
Visit Nelson Construction & Development →A development vision for Greater Burlington, Iowa.
No investment offering or solicitation.